interpertation of Mr. Schmoes results Essays - Education, Tests

interpertation of Mr. Schmoes results Essays - Education, Tests Interpretation of Mr. Bob Schmoes Intelligence and Skills February 17, 2019 Interpretation of Mr. Bob Schmoes Intelligence and Skills Bob Schmoe was a case that was referred by his case manager at the Department of Rehabilitation to have an evaluation done based on his intelligence and skills. He took the or the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence 2nd Edition ( WASI-2 ) and the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revision 4 ( WRAT-4 ) to show areas that he is having difficulties in with the goal that he gets referrals for assistance in trouble areas and work on improvements (Sample i ntelligence- a chievement Report, n. d; Perry, 2019) . Transcribed below is the discussion between hypothetical Ph, D. Perry and Bob S c hmoe recieving the results of said test s and any recommendations that will be benefic ial to Mr. S c hmoe. Ph. D . Perry : Good morning Mr. S c hmoe , h ow are you today? Mr. S c hmoe : Good M orning doctor. I am well and I will say I am feeling a little anxious about the results of my tests. Doctor : Mr. S c hmoe , there is no need for worry. The tests are just a way for us to help you in establishing which areas you may require help in to achieve a better way of life. These tests have nothing to do with how people may distinguish you. This is all constructed off certain areas of intellect that establish a person's intelligence and academic skills. Do you understand what I am referring to ? Mr. S c hmoe : Yes, I understand doc , give it to me straight. Doctor : Good. As you know, you took two different tests that assisted in measuring different subsets or areas of intellect. The first test the WAS I - 2 measured block design, vocabulary, matrix reasoning, and similarities. The second test the WRAT- 4 measured word reading, sentence completion, spelling, reading composite and math computation (Sample i ntelligence- a chievement Report, n. d ; Perry, 2019 ) . These tests will help us by showing which topics you have strength s or weakness in. The results are used in assist ing us in determining the best solution or course of action to better assist you in strengthening those weak areas you need help with . Do you understand so far Mr. S c hmoe? Mr. S c hmoe : Yes, you are going to let me know what each area means and what areas I need to work on. Doctor: Correct . When looking at the scores of the subsets for the test s you were given, and I compare them to individuals who are within your age group that also took the same test s . The scores tell us if you are a h igh average which specif ies you have a strength in that s ubset , average you are at a middle point , and low average specif ies a weakness for that s ubset . Your scores with the WASI -2 showed you have a full-scale IQ (FSIQ-4) score that is within average range. This score tells us that your cognitive abilities seem to be characteristic to those of your peers. The average scores in the subset's matrix reasoning, vocabulary, similarities, verbal comprehension, and perpetual reasoning index indicates that you have strengths in verbal abilities, and you do not have difficulties forming verbal concepts and using different words to form these thoughts (Perry, 2019) . You can form sentences, understand the ideas that are within the sentences, listen to sounds or look at sound structures and shape words from those sounds (Sample i ntelligence- a chievement Report, n. d ; Perry, 2019 ) . Block design you did fall in the low average range and what this means is you have some difficulty with pattern recognition in other words it was difficult for you to recreate a given pattern this is a weakness in the ability to understand and analyze abstract ideas from visual stimuli (Perry, 2019) . Mr. S c hmoe: So, developing different ideas and sentences, I am good at and I can finish